This week, Coffee with David is honored to bring
its readers a master--a legend--of the thriller and mystery genre: John Lutz.
This interview and giveaway was originally posted on The Writers' Lens. The
winner never claimed their prize.
"If I've scared somebody enough
to disturb their sleep--that's good."--John Lutz
David Alan Lucas: When you are starting to work on a new novel, what do you
find brings the story into focus for you? A Character? A setting? Something
else?
John Lutz: Almost
always the characters, and something of their relationship with each other. The
interplay between the characters is as important as the characters themselves.
DL: How
did you learn to write suspenseful thrillers?
JL:
By writing and writing and writing. I think the more you write, the more
you learn, and the better you write. Also I enjoy reading suspense novels;
especially if they are set in New York City, such as Lawrence Sanders’ “Deadly
Sin” series, published in the seventies. New York is a great place to set a
novel.
DL: What
key things make your thrillers work?
JL: I
would like to think they work because of the characters. They have to be real
enough for the reader to identify with them and on a certain level feel what
they are feeling and share in their experience.
"As a writer you're getting
inside the skin of your character in your book in the same way an actor gets
inside the skin of a character he plays on stage."-- John Lutz
DL: What
was the hardest part of writing thrillers and suspense?
JL:
It’s more difficult and time consuming to write a long, multiple
viewpoint novel than to write a linear detective novel or conventional
whodunit. There are more plates to keep spinning.
DL: You
are currently writing about serial killers. When you write their scenes,
do you ever scare yourself?
JL: Nope.
I’m too wrapped up in technique, and wondering if what I’m doing is working, to
feel what I hope the reader will feel. It’s gratifying to receive e-mails from
women thanking me for having scared them. Makes me think I’m on the right
track.
DL: How do
you sharpen your suspenseful scenes and when do you know, as the writer, that
you have it the way you want it?
JL: When I
believe I’ve revised enough, I set aside what I’ve written and come back to it
later with a fresh perspective. If it still feels to me that I’ve nailed a
scene or story, I’m satisfied.
DL: What
themes in your fiction writing seem to drive you the most?
JL: I like
my fiction to convey the notion that there are patterns and real cause
and effect in life (which is for the most part pretty random) and that
once we discern what’s happening, we have the ability to cope with it, or at
least learn to accept it.
DL: Do you
work on multiple novels at once? If so, how many?
JL: I take
it one book at a time, though if I’m between phases, such as a finished first
draft, or a second, I might work on another project. I’m probably giving the
impression that I revise a lot. I do.
DL: How
easy was it to take the leap of faith to become a serious writer and chase this
career? What did you find that you had to do to take the step?
JL:
When I received a surprisingly large advance for a novel, it became
apparent to me that this was my most marketable skill. I knew I could combine
what I very much enjoyed doing (writing) with obtaining what I very much needed
(money). A liberating moment.
DL: In
years past, new writers would battle their way in the pulp magazines to build their
readerships and their careers. Do you think that is still the case in the
explosion of electronic readers, blogs, e-zines, and other like media? Who do
you see as the current gatekeeper of the good writers and those who are still
developing?
JL: A comprehensive
answer would take several pages, and then it might be far wrong. Maybe the most
interesting thing about book-biz these days is that no one knows for sure where
it is headed. Where we’ve been, and where we are, might be much different from
where we’re going. There seems to be no gatekeeper, and the gate is wide open.
DL: When
you plot your novels, from whose point of view do you plot from? The
protagonist’s? The antagonist’s? The narrator’s? Some one else?
JL: In a
thriller I write from several alternating points of view. I also like to
write more linear PI novels from the protagonist’s POV, and in third person.
DL: Arthur
C. Clarke once wrote that when science catches up with the science fiction
writer, the science fiction writer needs to make a leap forward. With
fictional shows like CSI and reality TV shows like Killer Instinct, do you feel
that you have had to take a leap forward as a thriller writer to stay atop of
the changes in the science of criminal investigation? How do you stay ahead of
the game?
JL:
Definitely we have to leap, or at least crawl, forward to keep up. DNA alone
has forced many changes. Cell phones mean everyone can be in touch with
everyone else. The Internet provides information it took fictional detectives
not so long ago weeks (or chapters) to obtain. The more sophisticated cell
phones become, the more we crime writers have to adapt, because almost everyone
now has a cell phone, which is also a camera, which is also a GPS system, which
is also a research library, which is also a newspaper morgue, which is also a
recorder, which is also…
DL: What
novels, books, articles, magazines or other media most useful when you are
researching serial killers and criminal investigation?
JL:
See above. Google is probably my main source of research material.
DL: You
are a master and a legend in the genres of suspense and mystery. What was
your biggest fear when you decided to first be published as a novelist?
Do you still have those fears with each new book or are there other fears that
come up?
JL: Like
most of the writers I knew when I was starting out, my biggest fear was that I
wouldn’t sell enough copies to prompt the sale of another book. Fewer fears
now. I’m more confident that if I take the time and trouble to revise, I can
make whatever it is I’m writing work, Unlike many writers, I really do enjoy
revising, so that’s not much of a problem. It’s meticulous work, but it’s what
lends the fiction life. To paraphrase Mark Twain: “The difference
between the adequate word and the precise word is the difference between the
lightning bug and the lightning.”
DL: What
is your writing schedule like?
JL: I
usually work in the morning, then after lunch revise what I’ve written.
In both morning and afternoon, before starting to work I check e-mail,
Facebook, Twitter, to make sure nothing requires immediate attention.
DL: If you
could have coffee (or drink of your choice) with four other authors from any
time period, who would you choose and why?
JL: Shakespeare,
to see if I could get an honest answer out of him.; H.H. Munro (Saki) to see if
I could figure out how he did what no one else has been able to do; Joseph
Conrad, to see if he talks as rhythmically as he writes; Edgar Allan Poe, to
see if I could cheer him up.
DL: How
could my readers learn more about you?
JL: They
could visit my Facebook author page, Twitter, or my website, http://www.johnlutzonline.com
Here are some additional videos on YouTube about
John Lutz and his stories:
Meet John Lutz: http://youtu.be/aOsTgiwxUMM
John Lutz: The World of Frank Quinn: http://youtu.be/ZrH6MlWQaek
How do you win a free copy of
this book? To enter the contest, simply leave a comment or question on
Coffee with David blog between now (July 14th) and midnight July 20th, 2012.
Please include your email so we can reach you if you win. The more comments you
leave, the greater your chance of winning the contest. If you refer others
to Coffee with David who mention your name in their comments, I'll enter
your name again in our random number generator along with theirs, also
increasing your chances at winning! The winner will be chosen after midnight on
Friday, July 20th and the announcement made on Saturday, July 21st. Good luck
and comment often.
Thank you for reading and please
visit www.davidalanlucas.com and www.thewriterslens.com.
You can also follow me on twitter @Owlkenpowriter and the Writer’s Lens
@TheWritersLens. Fiction is the world where the philosopher is the most free in
our society to explore the human condition as he chooses.
No comments:
Post a Comment